can you fact check why the us government would want to use weather to manipulate the results of the forthcoming us election?

There is no credible evidence to suggest that the U.S. government is attempting to use weather manipulation to influence the outcome of upcoming elections. While conspiracy theories related to “weather control” (like the HAARP program) have been around for years, these claims have been debunked by scientists. The idea that weather could be deliberately manipulated to affect election results lacks any basis in factual reporting or verified scientific research. Weather patterns are complex and not something that can be controlled to achieve political objectives.

explain to a meathead why it wouldn’t be possible

Alright, here’s why manipulating weather for elections is impossible, even for the U.S. government. Weather is a massive, complex system controlled by natural forces like the sun, oceans, and atmosphere. We can’t just “aim” weather at a place—especially not with enough precision to influence elections! Plus, while technologies like cloud seeding exist to make it rain, that only works in very limited conditions, and it’s unpredictable. Trying to control something as massive as weather to influence politics would be like trying to stop a tornado with a fan—it’s just not happening.

they still don’t believe it, can you describe the science that would be needed to make this happen?

To control weather at the level you’re talking about, it would require an unimaginable amount of energy and advanced technology we don’t have. Weather systems are influenced by the sun’s energy, Earth’s rotation, and natural phenomena like oceans and wind patterns. To manipulate those forces, we’d need technology capable of controlling huge variables like atmospheric pressure, temperature, and moisture on a global scale. Even cloud seeding, which influences small weather patterns, is limited to making it rain under certain conditions. Achieving political manipulation through weather would need a level of control beyond what we understand scientifically.

The scale of energy and precision required makes it science fiction, not reality.

it’s not impossible though? What would be the guesstimated cost and size of something like this? Would we need to grow another sun to get the energy?

While not entirely impossible in theory, the technology and energy required to manipulate weather on the scale necessary to influence an election are beyond anything remotely feasible. To alter large weather systems, you’d need to control the atmosphere, ocean currents, and energy distribution on a global scale. The energy needed would be astronomical—comparable to harnessing the power of the sun. Building infrastructure for this would likely cost trillions of dollars and span continents, far exceeding current technological capabilities. Growing “another sun” is a good analogy for how far-fetched this idea is!

---